Quick Thoughts from Attadale Chiropractic Clinic
- Reduced odds of surgery were observed for those whose first provider was a chiropractor. 42.7% of workers with back injuries who first saw a surgeon had surgery, in contrast to only 1.5% of those who saw a chiropractor.
Keeney et al (2012), Spine - The size of the subluxation-based market? 8+ billion humans and many other vertebrates. See page 122 of https://doc.vortala.com/childsites/uploads/4034/files/animal-chiropractic-article.pdf
- Is the medical conspiracy to contain and eliminate chiropractic motivated by protecting patients?
- Is the medical conspiracy to contain and eliminate chiropractic motivated by protecting medical incomes?
- Is chiropractic being eliminated because subluxation-related disorders don’t need drugs and/or surgery?
- Who is harmed by, who benefits from, Australia’s Establishment containing and eliminating philosophy-subluxation based chiropractic?
- How did the Establishment contain and eliminate Australia’s traditional chiropractic?
- Chiropractic began with organ related subluxations, not with musculoskeletal related subluxations.
- Could chiropractic help a rat’s bowel prolapse? See case 122 of https://doc.vortala.com/childsites/uploads/4034/files/animal-chiropractic-article.pdf
- Do GPs know when their patients need chiropractic care? There are none so blind as those who will not see.
- Does medical education qualify gradates to identify subluxation-related disorders?
- Can an atlas adjustment alleviate subluxation-related related paralysis in the lower limbs? See https://www.apcj.net/ierano–bella-the-dog-improves-with-chiropractic/
